Log in

No account? Create an account
Jan. 23rd, 2009 @ 05:28 pm Ralph Nader's open letter to President Obama
In the Public Interest
by Ralph Nader

Dear President Obama:

Underneath many of our country’s economic problems is the thirty-year collapse of consumer protection—both of the regulatory kind and of the self-help kind known as proper access to justice.

Last month major consumer groups sent you a letter proposing action to rein in exploitation of consumers as debtors, as buyers of oil, gas and electricity, as patients needing health insurance and as eaters wanting safe goods.

Under the Bush regime, the words “consumer protection” were rarely uttered and the Bush administration almost never initiated any pro-consumer efforts, even with massive evidence before it, such as predatory lending and credit card abuses.

You need to recognize and elevate the GDP significance of fair consumer policies along with their moral and just attributes at a time of worsening recession.

I suggest you focus on the state of the poorest consumers in the urban and rural ghettos. As you know from your days with the New York Public Interest Group (NYPIRG) and as a community organizer in Chicago, the consumers in these areas are the most gouged and least protected. That the “poor pay more” has been extensively documented by civic, official and academic studies, and numerous local newspaper and television news reports.

Unfortunately, neither Congress nor the Executive branch have paid adequate attention to the tens of millions of people who lose at least 25 percent of their consumer dollars to multiple frauds and shoddy merchandise. You should establish special task forces in the Justice Department and the Federal Trade Commission on their plight and on the many proven but unused remedies to assure a fair marketplace with effective enforcement and grievance procedures.

Working with and galvanizing local and state agencies to enlarge their capacity and staff—with stimulus monies—can produce a triple-header—making the federal effort more effective, providing valuable jobs and freeing up billions of consumer dollars from the financial sink-hole of commercial crimes.

It requires the visibility and eloquence of your personal leadership to launch this long-overdue defense of poor people.

A second area of action is simply to update major areas of regulatory health and safety that have been frozen for thirty years. These include modernizing standards for auto and tire safety, food safety, aviation and railroad safety and occupational health and trauma protection.

New knowledge, new marketing forays, and new technologies have accumulated during this period without application. It is the obsolescence of so many safety standards hailing from the fifties, sixties and seventies that permits the tricky, corporate advertising claims that products “exceed federal safety standards.”

Note for example that the SEC has never come close to regulating the recent explosion of myriad collateralized debt obligations (CDOs). The massive speculation in this area is destabilizing the national and world economies.

Third, you need to articulate and provide a high profile to what western Europeans have long called “social consumerism.” Citizens are consumers of government services for which they pay as taxpayers. In return they are entitled to prompt, accurate and courteous responses to their inquiries and to their perceived needs as embraced by the authorizing statutes.

To begin with, Americans need to be able to get through to their government agencies and departments. Being put on hold interminably with automated messages to nowhere, not receiving replies of any kind to their letters, and generally getting the brush-off even with the deadlines explicated in the Freedom of Information Act have been a bi-partisan failure.

However, under the Bush regime, not answering serious letters from dedicated individuals and groups on time-sensitive matters of policy and action—as with the Iraq war and occupation—became standard operating procedure—starting with President Bush himself.

This stonewalling has turned people off so much that they do not even bother to “ask their government” for assistance and that includes an astonishingly unresponsive Congress (other than for ministerial requests such as locating lost VA or social security checks.)

As you shape the Obama White House, bear in mind that the “change you can believe in” is one of kind, not just degree.

Sincerely yours,

Ralph Nader
About this Entry
[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 24th, 2009 04:27 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Dear Ralph Nader,

You are increasingly fringe and inconsequential, and the only thing that keeps you in the public eye is your own ill-advised ego.

Please let the grownups run the nation, and take your irrelevant self to the nearest Corvair Owner's Club meeting.

[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 24th, 2009 06:18 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Sorry, but you alone don't get to speak for humanity. Ralph Nader has dedicated his whole life to helping the public, and if you did a little research you would know that he has contributed to things like

Freedom of Information Act
National Automobile and Highway Traffic Safety Act (1965)
Clean Water Act (1968)
Clean Air Act (1970)
Co-Op Bank Bill (1978)
Law establishing Environmental Protection Agency (1970)
Consumer Product Safety Act
Foreign Corrupt Practices Act
Mine Health and Safety Act
Whistleblower Protection Act
Medical Devices safety
Nuclear power safety
Mobile home safety
Consumer credit disclosure law
Pension protection law
Funeral home cost disclosure law
Tire safety & grading disclosure law
Wholesome Meat Act
Natural Gas Pipeline Safety Act
Federal Coal Mine Health and Safety Act
Wholesome Poultry Product Act
Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) 1970
Safe Water Drinking Act
National Traffic and Motor Vehicle Safety Act

Hardly inconsequential.
[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 24th, 2009 06:28 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Voted for Ralph in 2000/2004/2008 and I'll vote for him in 2012 if he runs.
[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 27th, 2009 07:35 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
See, this is why I use the modifier "increasingly" before the word inconsequential. What of that list has happened in the last decade? The last two?

Try actually meeting the man, talking to him, ore reading some of the interviews he does. He operates solely to feed his ego, and he thinks that he is allowed to say what he will and influence policy simply because of what he has done in the past.

His political runs are little more than feeding his own ego.
[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 27th, 2009 07:45 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
"Try actually meeting the man, talking to him, ore reading some of the interviews he does. "

I have met and talked to him. I have seen him be interviewed in person. I have been present for about 7 of his public speeches at rallies. Why? because I worked as an event coordinator on his campaign. I was interested in the campaign because of the issues presented, and decided to get involved. It was not until meeting the man that I realized what drives him is in fact a deep sense of injustice in the system, and a desire to make it work for normal people. Every event runs over-time because he insists on making sure every person gets a response to their questions. Frankly, you don't know what you're talking about.
[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 29th, 2009 04:01 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
So you admit you have a great bias in his favor, instead of attempting to look at what he does with a vaguely-objective eye.

Noted. Excuse me if I fail to take your point of view overly seriously as a result.

(Actually I DO know of what I speak, I just refuse to treat him or any person with the unmitigated, irrational love of a fab-boy type.)
Date:January 24th, 2009 03:22 pm (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Which grownups? The grownups that are already circumventing their own executive orders less than a week after issuing them?
[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 25th, 2009 02:47 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Dear Ralph Nader,

You became COMPLETELY irrelevant the moment you wondered aloud whether Obama would be an "Uncle Tom".

Ride off into the sunset at any speed you like as long as it's away...
[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 25th, 2009 03:01 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
I understand why people didn't like it, but it is a valid question to ask.
[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 25th, 2009 03:46 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
there is something wrong with you
[User Picture Icon]
Date:January 25th, 2009 03:48 am (UTC)
(Permanent Link)
Care to give a reason?